Not sure why window licker mango, ol beatitoff and xfly especially since they live in different countries want to be Russian trolls and spread false propaganda and believe the MSM that lies to them for years and years
I’m sure they are just miserable old men as one he stated
Touched on this earlier
"An N-95 mask filters out particulate matter larger than .3 microns. So the question then is how big is a COVID particle. A COVID particle is about .1 micron....this idea of people doing anything particularly useful w...a mask is just LOONEY TUNES." - Sen. Dr. Scott Jenson, M.D.
“From the New England Journal of Medicine on masks for COVID: "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection."
“From the US Department of Labor, on surgical masks for COVID: "Will not protect the wearer against airborne transmissible infectious agents due to loose fit and lack of seal or inadequate filtration."
From "Inside Surgery," a premier surgeon's journal, in 2009 during the swine flu outbreak, in an article titled "Standard Surgical Masks Do Not Protect Wearer From Getting Swine Flu." "For the prevention of transmission of swine flu this type of mask is ESSENTIALLY WORTHLESS.
“you believe COVID fatality numbers that Western govts & the mainstream media give you at face-value, you're not thinking at all. "Individuals who have died with COVID-19, but not as a result of COVID-19 are included in the case counts for COVID-19”
“The "droplet" argument for wearing masks is basically just uninformed. It's a nice idea until you look at the research & how porous masks are. "Surgical masks will NOT block aerosolized particles AS SMALL AS A DROPLET CONTAINING INFLUENZA VIRIONS."
“It's a serious problem to compare Asia w the West to justify masks. Asia & the West approach it completely differently. COVID is politicized in the West to ratchet up fear, justify lockdowns & as a left anti-Trump campaign. Asia wants to MINIMIZE it, even in just appearance.”
“China has given questionably low COVID numbers, while the US does the OPPOSITE. The West's (incl Europe) politics bleed into $$$. Western hospitals get paid MORE for COVID deaths. NOT in Asia. "COVID-19 had been incentivized."
Why “face mask don’t work” in Oral Health Journal: "Traditionally face masks have been recommended to protect...from the 'DROPLET' route of infection....[BUT] neither the filter performance nor the facial fit...qualify them as being devices which protect against respiratory infections."
“"Masks were INCAPABLE of filtering out 80-85% of particles varying in size from .3 to 2.0 (!) microns....the filter material of face masks does NOT retain or filter to viruses or other submicron particles.”
“The primary reason for mandating...face masks is to protect dental personnel from airborne pathogens. This review has established that face masks are INCAPABLE of providing such....protection. Unless the CDC [et all] admit this, they will be GUILTY OF PERPETUATING A MYTH."
“Between 2004 & 2016 at least a dozen research or review articles have been published on the inadequacies of face masks. All agree that the poor facial fit & limited filtration...of face masks make them unable to prevent the wearer inhaling airborne particles."
For Xfly. “The Canadian Centre for Occupational Health & Safety in 2016: "The filter material of surgical masks does not retain or filter out submicron particles [COVID-19 is .1 micron, thus a submicron]."
“Dr. Leonie Walker, Principal Researcher of the New Zealand Nurses Organization: "There are no convincing scientific data that support the effectiveness of masks for respiratory protection [against influenza]. The masks we use are not designed for such purposes."
“For those claiming N-95 offer more protection than surgical or other masks, there are studies & meta-studies (studies that compile MULTIPLE studies) that show that in fact, N-95 masks (which filter 95% of .3 microns+) are as helpless against viral-sized particles (.1 microns)”
I’m sure they are just miserable old men as one he stated
Touched on this earlier
"An N-95 mask filters out particulate matter larger than .3 microns. So the question then is how big is a COVID particle. A COVID particle is about .1 micron....this idea of people doing anything particularly useful w...a mask is just LOONEY TUNES." - Sen. Dr. Scott Jenson, M.D.
“From the New England Journal of Medicine on masks for COVID: "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection."
“From the US Department of Labor, on surgical masks for COVID: "Will not protect the wearer against airborne transmissible infectious agents due to loose fit and lack of seal or inadequate filtration."
From "Inside Surgery," a premier surgeon's journal, in 2009 during the swine flu outbreak, in an article titled "Standard Surgical Masks Do Not Protect Wearer From Getting Swine Flu." "For the prevention of transmission of swine flu this type of mask is ESSENTIALLY WORTHLESS.
“you believe COVID fatality numbers that Western govts & the mainstream media give you at face-value, you're not thinking at all. "Individuals who have died with COVID-19, but not as a result of COVID-19 are included in the case counts for COVID-19”
“The "droplet" argument for wearing masks is basically just uninformed. It's a nice idea until you look at the research & how porous masks are. "Surgical masks will NOT block aerosolized particles AS SMALL AS A DROPLET CONTAINING INFLUENZA VIRIONS."
“It's a serious problem to compare Asia w the West to justify masks. Asia & the West approach it completely differently. COVID is politicized in the West to ratchet up fear, justify lockdowns & as a left anti-Trump campaign. Asia wants to MINIMIZE it, even in just appearance.”
“China has given questionably low COVID numbers, while the US does the OPPOSITE. The West's (incl Europe) politics bleed into $$$. Western hospitals get paid MORE for COVID deaths. NOT in Asia. "COVID-19 had been incentivized."
Why “face mask don’t work” in Oral Health Journal: "Traditionally face masks have been recommended to protect...from the 'DROPLET' route of infection....[BUT] neither the filter performance nor the facial fit...qualify them as being devices which protect against respiratory infections."
“"Masks were INCAPABLE of filtering out 80-85% of particles varying in size from .3 to 2.0 (!) microns....the filter material of face masks does NOT retain or filter to viruses or other submicron particles.”
“The primary reason for mandating...face masks is to protect dental personnel from airborne pathogens. This review has established that face masks are INCAPABLE of providing such....protection. Unless the CDC [et all] admit this, they will be GUILTY OF PERPETUATING A MYTH."
“Between 2004 & 2016 at least a dozen research or review articles have been published on the inadequacies of face masks. All agree that the poor facial fit & limited filtration...of face masks make them unable to prevent the wearer inhaling airborne particles."
For Xfly. “The Canadian Centre for Occupational Health & Safety in 2016: "The filter material of surgical masks does not retain or filter out submicron particles [COVID-19 is .1 micron, thus a submicron]."
“Dr. Leonie Walker, Principal Researcher of the New Zealand Nurses Organization: "There are no convincing scientific data that support the effectiveness of masks for respiratory protection [against influenza]. The masks we use are not designed for such purposes."
“For those claiming N-95 offer more protection than surgical or other masks, there are studies & meta-studies (studies that compile MULTIPLE studies) that show that in fact, N-95 masks (which filter 95% of .3 microns+) are as helpless against viral-sized particles (.1 microns)”
